- Joined
- Jul 24, 2013
- Posts
- 5,436
I wonder what this "8 year" warranty says about battery capacity loss. Capacity will deteriorate over time. When, if ever, would they replace the batteries due to such deterioration?
We all should hold our judgement, but I am pretty optimistic about fuel cells. I have no data, but I suspect that a LOT more R&D is going into them than quiet dyno-fuelled generators. ICE is a dead end and everybody knows it. I agree with you that gensets could be vastly better, but nobody is going to bother.
OTOH, fuel cells combined with a medium-sized AGM battery are a potential game changer. As I said above, I think that such a setup could ultimately be just as good as a huge lithium system, without the onerous management issues. Whether it will have its own downsides remains to be seen.
I wonder what this "8 year" warranty says about battery capacity loss. Capacity will deteriorate over time. When, if ever, would they replace the batteries due to such deterioration?
The key reason for my skepticism is fuel requirement, hydrogen is necessary for efficient fuel cells. It can be distributed via Schwarzenegger’s Hydrogen I-5 freewayor made in situ from a methanol or an LPG fuel or other hydrogen loaded chemicals. This in situ generation of hydrogen is a major challenge, it requires high temperature catalytic reaction very sensitive to contamination, high purity fuel would be difficult to get from LPG RV distribution. So a special LPG or other fuel would have to be distributed at likely high cost. I wish to be more optimistic but I am not.
WATT Fuel Cell Corporation is a developer and manufacturer of Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (“SOFC”) stacks and systems that operate on common, readily available hydrocarbon fuels such as propane, natural gas, JP-8, and diesel.
Something to learn from the ARV
They have already done the research two years ago
The Chevy Bolt guarantees 60% capacity over the 8 year warranty.
https://electrek.co/2016/12/07/gm-chevy-bolt-ev-battery-degradation-up-to-40-warranty/
Because of the difference in use patterns among the owners, I can't see how degradation can be uniformly quantified.
Something to learn from the ARV
They have already done the research two years ago
Going to a 48v battery bank allows a smaller, lighter, higher power alternator for charging. Here is the spec for the Volta alternator. Specs for the rest of the system components are also on their website at the second link.
Going to a 48v battery bank allows a smaller, lighter, higher power alternator for charging. Here is the spec for the Volta alternator. Specs for the rest of the system components are also on their website at the second link.
MB fixed high idle option is about 1200 rpms. That's the option ARV used for mine. The variable option can be higher. For the life of me, why does everyone think about just idling? I don't have to idle my ARV. Just drive it. I seldom ever idle our ARV to charge batteries.Looking at the alternator specs, it doesn't cut in until the alternator shaft speed is above 2732 rpm. With a 2:1 pulley ratio that would require an engine speed of 1366 rpm. With a 3:1 ratio it would be 910 rpm. Aren't either of these engine speeds higher than conventional idling produces?
MB fixed high idle option is about 1200 rpms. That's the option ARV used for mine. The variable option can be higher. For the life of me, why does everyone think about just idling? I don't have to idle my ARV. Just drive it. I seldom ever idle our ARV to charge batteries.
You seldom idle for charging because you have the luxury of 800ah.
...
Does the Travato Volta system have an auto start and high idle feature for idling?
I think the biggest thing here is this. Most of us agree that ARV tries to do the BEST in improving. They charge for it but they do it.
If at this point they think the Volta system is the best and are installing it on their vans why should we question it.
....