Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×
 
 


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 07-31-2016, 04:28 PM   #21
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,380
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cruising7388 View Post
What niche woud a WGO Transit Class B fill that isn't addressed by the ERA and the Travato?
A Transit would likely fill the niche of buyers who want something bigger than a Travato but not on a Mercedes chassis. Pricing would likely be between the Tavato and the ERA.

Lots of reasons buyers might prefer a Transit to a Sprinter...

Lower price
Made in US
More dealer and service locations
Traditional Ford buyers
Better handling and powertrain according to many Sprinter owners who have switched to Transit
Less complexity in the design of the Transit compared to the Sprinter

Transit has a couple easily fixed deficiencies vs the Sprinter which will likely be fixed by Ford, no swivel driver's seat and less max GVWR...
gregmchugh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2016, 04:39 PM   #22
Site Team
 
avanti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 5,428
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gregmchugh View Post
Transit has a couple easily fixed deficiencies vs the Sprinter which will likely be fixed by Ford, no swivel driver's seat and less max GVWR...
Is the living space similar?
__________________
Now: 2022 Fully-custom buildout (Ford Transit EcoBoost AWD)
Formerly: 2005 Airstream Interstate (Sprinter 2500 T1N)
2014 Great West Vans Legend SE (Sprinter 3500 NCV3 I4)
avanti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2016, 04:54 PM   #23
Platinum Member
 
Davydd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 5,967
Default

The Transit will best mirror the capabilities and designs of the older Sprinter T1N which I think is a nice sweet spot the Promaster so far seems unable to fill, IMO.
__________________
Davydd
2021 Advanced RV 144 custom Sprinter
2015 Advanced RV Extended body Sprinter
2011 Great West Van Legend Sprinter
2005 Pleasure-way Plateau TS Sprinter
Davydd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2016, 04:55 PM   #24
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,380
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by avanti View Post
Is the living space similar?
Similar to the Sprinter in terms of interior space, I believe the tall Transit has more interior height and the XL Sprinter may have more floor area, not sure about that...
gregmchugh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2016, 05:09 PM   #25
BBQ
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: East
Posts: 2,483
Default

Here's a comparison.

Got this off the web... I think it is a bit old.

Will search further. Or I will compile a new one.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 5460daf773ca30c9080c015fd44f6fb5.jpg (76.6 KB, 21 views)
BBQ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2016, 08:41 PM   #26
BBQ
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: East
Posts: 2,483
Default

BBQ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2016, 09:55 PM   #27
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 12,455
Default

Interesting video of Sprinter production.

Some take it as you will observations:

Very surprised at the hand painting of the non-exterior painted surfaces. I didn't think anyone did that any more. Robots are the king of consistent paint coverage, and the hidden areas are probably the most important for corrosion resistance. Humans are very inconsistent at this kind of stuff.

Also surprised to see the robots put adhesive on for the roof panels, and then a human apply a small amount to the panel itself before submitting it to the auto install sled. Looks like an on the fly addressing of a problem like a leak.

The windshield install was interesting in that it looked like a both side gasket, manually applied by a human before going to auto assembly. Very manual install with large forces, atypical of mass production these days due to injury potential. But, there was a dwell time at assembly, so there could also be some adhesive going on (didn't have sound so might have missed something). Every windshield I have seen for the last two decades has been put in with just adhesive.

How many more angles can they show the entire drive train being located under the body? No video of all the humans putting in the bolts to hold it in place downstream.

All and all, it looked like a typical modern vehicle assembly plant. Of course there are some issues addressed inline, and maybe some things that could be improved, but not different that others in most regards.
booster is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2016, 10:00 PM   #28
Platinum Member
 
wincrasher's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Greer, South Carolina
Posts: 2,611
Default

I can't tell you how many hundreds of Promasters I've seen this summer on car carriers - all painted up with US Postal Service and U-Haul branding. Promaster is the lower cost option, and many fleet buyers are going with it.

In RV space, none can compete on price. A Transit conversion cannot compete with it - but it certainly will with Sprinter. Even at equal price, which the chassis is fairly close - there are plenty of buyers that would prefer the gas engine, and the percieved bigger dealer network. My guess though is that the big manufacturers will adjust the vehicle content (equipment, finishes, etc), so that Transit is a mid-price offering and preserve their luxury segment for Mercedes.

FWIW, I have it on good authority that WGO is prepping their Transit production line, and will have prototypes at RV shows soon.
__________________
2019 Winnebago Travato GL
Follow my blog: https://www.wincrasher.blogspot.com
Our Facebook group is: https://www.facebook.com/groups/ClassBCamperVans/
wincrasher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2016, 10:15 PM   #29
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,380
Default

What happened to the group of naysayers who thought that the Transit was a no go for Class B manufacturers??
gregmchugh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2016, 10:41 PM   #30
BBQ
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: East
Posts: 2,483
Default

A different edit


BBQ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2016, 10:42 PM   #31
BBQ
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: East
Posts: 2,483
Default

BBQ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2016, 10:43 PM   #32
BBQ
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: East
Posts: 2,483
Default

BBQ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2016, 06:08 AM   #33
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: CA
Posts: 1,668
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wincrasher View Post
In RV space, none can compete on price. A Transit conversion cannot compete with it - but it certainly will with Sprinter. Even at equal price, which the chassis is fairly close - there are plenty of buyers that would prefer the gas engine, and the percieved bigger dealer network.
The gas engine seems like a good choice for the Transit although Leisure Travel decided to go the other way with their Transit, the Wonder, and is building it with a diesel.
cruising7388 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2016, 06:28 AM   #34
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,380
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cruising7388 View Post
The gas engine seems like a good choice for the Transit although Leisure Travel decided to go the other way with their Transit, the Wonder, and is building it with a diesel.
The diesel is the only viable engine for an RV on the cutaway Transit until Ford offers the EcoBoost gas engine on the cutaway. The gas engine option currently available on the cutaway is not a reasonable choice for an RV which is always near GVWR. That is why you currently only see Transit Class C RVs with Diesel engines.
gregmchugh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2016, 05:42 AM   #35
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 978
Default

There are a couple class "C"s on the Transit gasser, such as a Thor (Coachmen Micro) and Forest River offering... but if you look at them, they don't have any slide-outs, and are aimed at the lower end of the "C" market, while the Winnebago Fuse and Thor Compass/Gemini use the diesel, and are aimed between the Ford E-350/E-450 "C"s and the Sprinters.

I personally wouldn't want to have a non-aspirated Transit "C"... I'd rather go with an Econoline chassis, or wait until the EB is an option.
mlts22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT. The time now is 03:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.