Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×
 
 


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 05-05-2015, 11:00 PM   #1
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 978
Default Flexible or framed solar panels?

What would be better to go with to either augment an existing installation or go with a new install? Regular solar panels with frames, or the newer flexible panels that require no holes drilled... just 3M tape/glue and caulk/sealant around the edges of the panels. However, the downside of flexible panels is the less wattage they bring in, the shorter warranties, and the fact that panels with frames usually have an air gap between the panel and the van, which provides shade and insulation.
mlts22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2015, 11:14 PM   #2
Site Team
 
avanti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 5,428
Default Re: Flexible or framed solar panels?

I think it is a straight tradeoff between aesthetics and functionality. Of the considerations you mention, I suspect that the air gap is the most significant. PVs work MUCH better when cool, they say.
__________________
Now: 2022 Fully-custom buildout (Ford Transit EcoBoost AWD)
Formerly: 2005 Airstream Interstate (Sprinter 2500 T1N)
2014 Great West Vans Legend SE (Sprinter 3500 NCV3 I4)
avanti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2015, 11:27 PM   #3
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 12,455
Default Re: Flexible or framed solar panels?

Like Avanti says, form vs function. If you look at the specs on the rigid panels, their ideal mount is several inches off the roof, as they know they want to keep them as cool as possible. I have always wondered about the wind baffles folks like Roadtrek put in the front of panels, I would think, depending on wind direction, they could also make the panels run hotter when parked. With the flexible you also lose the ability to have them all horizontal, as they follow whatever surface they are on.
booster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2015, 01:24 AM   #4
Platinum Member
 
Davydd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 5,967
Default Re: Flexible or framed solar panels?

You gotta quit watching the Wynns. there are other ways to mount flexible solar panels. I have a custom manufactured flexible solar panel system. Each panel is 140 watts (x 3). They are mounted on an ABS type plastic and trimmed out with a aluminum frame. The assembly is flexible enough to sit on top of the Sprnter roof ribs and span and follow the crown of the roof for a low profile appearance yet be more than an inch off the roof. The assembly is gutter attached and you have to look closely to see the edges. The crown provides positive drainage and the clearance keeps them cooler than direct roof attached. Each panel is zoned in half so partial shade does not affect the whole panel. Each panel also has its own MPPT controller. I saw the three mounted inside the cabinetry box that encloses the Outback inverter. From what I understand the panels are European and not any sold by others in the U.S. They are obviously very light weight as there is no glass and rigid assembly involved.

They were underperforming IMO when we were in Arizona. So adjustments were made that did not involve the panels. Now we have a positive gain at the end of the day despite havin a high overhead of almost 10 amps per hour battery drain from inverter on, refrigerator and I think at least three 1000 watt amplifiers and lots of parasitic controllers and idiot lights. We even have a trickle charger Dom the house batteries to the chassis battery. If I shut off the inverter I can save about 4 amps per hour and lose the use of outlets, microwave and AC. But our electric articulated beds also run on 120vac. So I leave it own.
__________________
Davydd
2021 Advanced RV 144 custom Sprinter
2015 Advanced RV Extended body Sprinter
2011 Great West Van Legend Sprinter
2005 Pleasure-way Plateau TS Sprinter
Davydd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2015, 01:52 AM   #5
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 12,455
Default Re: Flexible or framed solar panels?

Davydd said:

Quote:
Solar alone on a B could not charge the batteries. My 420 watts of solar on a perfect day will maybe recharge to compensate for the compressor refrigerator and parasitic energy loss.
Davydd said:

Quote:
Now we have a positive gain at the end of the day despite havin a high overhead of almost 10 amps per hour battery drain from inverter on, refrigerator and I think at least three 1000 watt amplifiers and lots of parasitic controllers and idiot lights. We even have a trickle charger Dom the house batteries to the chassis battery
.

IMO, 420 watts of solar would be able to support many of the folks with B's, under most circumstances, as your second post indicates.
booster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2015, 03:08 AM   #6
Platinum Member
 
wincrasher's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Greer, South Carolina
Posts: 2,611
Default Re: Flexible or framed solar panels?

I have 320 watts on my Oliver (glass panels). It's able to keep 400 amp hours topped off without issue. I've never even used 25% of my capacity. To my surprise, they still throw alot of amps even though they are fairly filthy.

As far as the flexible panels go, AMSolar decided not to sell them as they had issues with them cupping and wearing/scratching much like the Wynns have experienced. It's not surprising either, considering the material is not glass, but a plastic.

I don't think the folks at AMSolar did any dancing on their panels either.
__________________
2019 Winnebago Travato GL
Follow my blog: https://www.wincrasher.blogspot.com
Our Facebook group is: https://www.facebook.com/groups/ClassBCamperVans/
wincrasher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2015, 12:02 AM   #7
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 24
Default

Hi Davydd,
Why were you running your engine generator at ARV Fest? Thanks.
classbbud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2015, 01:06 AM   #8
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 23
Default

Aren't the flexible panels more susceptible to scratching? Observed some with scratches amongst the Liveaboard sailing Community.
Highlander is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2015, 01:10 AM   #9
Platinum Member
 
Davydd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 5,967
Default

Just for the halibut mostly. I never got close to actually needing to. I was there for 5 straight nights boondocking. It would have never kicked on the autogen from what I could estimate. I have autogen set at 25% forgetting that on the percentage readout 25% is actually 0%. So, I thought why not just keep it in the top half percentage wise. We lose about 20% per day max if we don't cook. We weren't even brewing coffee there.
__________________
Davydd
2021 Advanced RV 144 custom Sprinter
2015 Advanced RV Extended body Sprinter
2011 Great West Van Legend Sprinter
2005 Pleasure-way Plateau TS Sprinter
Davydd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2015, 01:12 AM   #10
Platinum Member
 
Davydd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 5,967
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Highlander View Post
Are the flexible panels more susceptible to scratching?
I would think so. Glass shouldn't scratch much unless it was raining diamonds.
__________________
Davydd
2021 Advanced RV 144 custom Sprinter
2015 Advanced RV Extended body Sprinter
2011 Great West Van Legend Sprinter
2005 Pleasure-way Plateau TS Sprinter
Davydd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2015, 02:12 AM   #11
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 24
Default

Davydd: Thanks for your reply. We are trying to decide between the 800 A hr and 1200 A hr. The 1200 A hr weighs 200 pounds more. I don't think we are the type of travelers that want to move every day. So my thought is it's better to have it and not use it than to not have it and wish we had. Does an extra 200 pounds take a big bite out of the payload?
classbbud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2015, 02:57 AM   #12
Platinum Member
 
Davydd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 5,967
Default

classbbud,

I've gone into exhaustive detail as to how I arrived at my decision in the first place to go to 800ah of battery and just recently followed up with my experience. Unless you have an unusual electrical need or think you will use air conditioning a lot I don't think you would ever need more than 800ah. It is all covered in a thread I started called Advancing Alvar in this ClassBForum. Much more than I can say here.
__________________
Davydd
2021 Advanced RV 144 custom Sprinter
2015 Advanced RV Extended body Sprinter
2011 Great West Van Legend Sprinter
2005 Pleasure-way Plateau TS Sprinter
Davydd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2015, 03:12 AM   #13
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 12,455
Default

Davydd uses a lot of power, so if you have similar usage, and don't like to move often or idle the engine, you may want to get the bigger battery bank. With poor sun, Davydd will be out of power in 3 days of his normal use, maybe even less, IIRC. Even in good sun, it won't keep up and will only buy a little more time. All Davydd's calculations are based on very short stays, so they very possibly wouldn't apply to your desire for longer stops.

You may want to start by comparing what electrical loads you have compared to Davydd, so you can get a feel for how much power you will use per day. I think Davydd is using quite a bit more than the ARV computer program originally predicted, so real world use information can be a good place to start, and then tweak to fit your camping style.
booster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2015, 03:49 AM   #14
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 24
Default

Thanks Booster. Davydd, do you know what your payload is for Alvar?
classbbud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2015, 04:11 AM   #15
Site Team
 
avanti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 5,428
Default

Also, note that DavyDD has come to dislike hookups. Obviously, if you usually have shore power during your longer stays, you don't need big batteries.
__________________
Now: 2022 Fully-custom buildout (Ford Transit EcoBoost AWD)
Formerly: 2005 Airstream Interstate (Sprinter 2500 T1N)
2014 Great West Vans Legend SE (Sprinter 3500 NCV3 I4)
avanti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2015, 04:29 AM   #16
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 24
Default

Thanks Avanti. I also do not want to use hookups. My main concern is the extra 200 pounds that the 1200 A hr battery will subtract from the available payload.
classbbud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2015, 07:49 AM   #17
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: SoCal
Posts: 792
Default

You're worried about 200 lbs ? Simply leave wife and her effects at home
stanw909 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2015, 03:29 PM   #18
Platinum Member
 
Davydd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 5,967
Default

We are getting a bit off topic here. I think I posted my weight in Advancing Alvar. I don't have it handy as I type this. 9,800 lbs or so with tanks filled sticks in my mind. Your additional batteries are 228 lbs plus the additional weight of the enclosed support. You might be looking at closer to 300 lbs. or more.

BTW, I am not aware of any ARV computer program predicting anything. Usage varies among ARV owners. I had only been trying to test to the limits with no regards to conservation. My conclusion is I can easily go a week or about as long as I can go without tank dumping or water filling requiring me to get up and move if I practiced any amount of electrical conservation. One big one would be to simply turn off the inverter when not really needing it. That alone could be as much as 100ah per day. You are paying for an expensive second alternator and high idle option. I've concluded idling is not that bad a thing and would use it if staying some place like BLM land if I wanted to sit. That is another reason I idled at Advanced Fest in the parking lot. Everyone else was doing it and it disturbed no one. I would never do it at the Chisos Basin CG in Big Bend NP for instance. Most likely I will drive someplace and fast charge my batteries anyway even if spending a week in one place.
__________________
Davydd
2021 Advanced RV 144 custom Sprinter
2015 Advanced RV Extended body Sprinter
2011 Great West Van Legend Sprinter
2005 Pleasure-way Plateau TS Sprinter
Davydd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2015, 03:41 PM   #19
Platinum Member
 
Davydd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 5,967
Default

My solar is going like gangbusters right now. I have my ARV parked facing east to west so all three of my solar panels are getting optimum sun with little shading. Problem is at home I am plugged into 30 amp service and have full batteries. All that sun is going to waste.

However, last week I had to unplug as I was having my garage re-sided. It sat for 5 days that way and got down to 27% on the battery with inverter turned on but refrigerator turned off. That was a net usage of 438ah (.73 x 600 usable ah). We were in and out of the van all week and I even spent some time watching TV.
__________________
Davydd
2021 Advanced RV 144 custom Sprinter
2015 Advanced RV Extended body Sprinter
2011 Great West Van Legend Sprinter
2005 Pleasure-way Plateau TS Sprinter
Davydd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2015, 03:43 PM   #20
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 12,455
Default

90ah per day without the inverter or frig, and minimal use. Where is all the power going?
booster is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT. The time now is 05:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.