Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×
 
 


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 09-03-2016, 01:10 AM   #21
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 554
Default

One problem with direct injection is the inability of the detergents in fuel to clean the intake valves since fuel never passes through them. Ford is currently having a problem with this.
mojoman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2016, 01:26 AM   #22
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Kansas City, Ks. Suburb
Posts: 896
Send a message via Yahoo to bobojay
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mojoman View Post
One problem with direct injection is the inability of the detergents in fuel to clean the intake valves since fuel never passes through them. Ford is currently having a problem with this.
Correct with their DI engines. Also having a throttle body clogging problem with the EB's. Seems to be affecting a large number
__________________
Bob & Sharon
2019 Winnebago Travato K (2018 Chassis)

Past RV's: 2013 WGO ERA 70A, Chevy PW Lexor
Itasca Navion, 29' Jayco 5th Wheel
bobojay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2016, 01:28 AM   #23
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 12,457
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mojoman View Post
One problem with direct injection is the inability of the detergents in fuel to clean the intake valves since fuel never passes through them. Ford is currently having a problem with this.
Interesting, I hadn't heard that. That certainly could be tied in to the intake/exhaust tuning to prevent exhaust from backing up into the intake as we just talked about. I wonder if the other manufacturers who have been doing GDI have had similar issues?

I would think diesels would also have the same type of thing, as they all are direct injection.
booster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2016, 01:32 AM   #24
BBQ
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: East
Posts: 2,483
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mojoman View Post
It comes down to another thing to clog or wear out that also contaminates the intake track. I prefer the method of not having one and a cleaner intake.

Some surprised Honda V6 drivers can tell you how expensive it is to replace the EGR valve. It is buried deep in the back of the engine. You pretty well have to remove the top to get to it. $$$


BBQ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2016, 01:33 AM   #25
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Kansas City, Ks. Suburb
Posts: 896
Send a message via Yahoo to bobojay
Default

Also back to page one here. If the note was made about the PM having more power referring to my post, I didn't say it had more power, I was referring to the acceleration for the first 50' or so.
The EB obviously has more juice by far. No comparison to the others at all. It's in a van power class all by itself....

Also interesting note about the 2017 Pentastar. I hadn't heard about the "new" EGR valve setup. Thing is, is the new DI version being installed in the PM '17 models??
__________________
Bob & Sharon
2019 Winnebago Travato K (2018 Chassis)

Past RV's: 2013 WGO ERA 70A, Chevy PW Lexor
Itasca Navion, 29' Jayco 5th Wheel
bobojay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2016, 01:36 AM   #26
BBQ
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: East
Posts: 2,483
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mojoman View Post
One problem with direct injection is the inability of the detergents in fuel to clean the intake valves since fuel never passes through them. Ford is currently having a problem with this.
Quote:
Originally Posted by booster View Post
Interesting, I hadn't heard that. That certainly could be tied in to the intake/exhaust tuning to prevent exhaust from backing up into the intake as we just talked about. I wonder if the other manufacturers who have been doing GDI have had similar issues?

I would think diesels would also have the same type of thing, as they all are direct injection.

Also, the valves can overheat and burn more easily
because they do not get the cooling benefit when fuel is blasted through them.

Toyota is remediating this problem by having BOTH direct injection and port injection in the same engine.
BBQ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2016, 02:40 AM   #27
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 554
Default

PVC and EGR contribute to the intake side crud. I'm thinking of installing a air/oil separator like this one:
https://www.summitracing.com/parts/m...GQEaAla98P8HAQ
mojoman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2016, 02:52 AM   #28
Platinum Member
 
wincrasher's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Greer, South Carolina
Posts: 2,611
Default

I thought I had read somewhere that not having the EGR meant that you could idle for long periods without concern, thus justifying the installation of the second alternator. Am I imagining that?

If true then that would make some gas vans to have more potential for that setup than others.
__________________
2019 Winnebago Travato GL
Follow my blog: https://www.wincrasher.blogspot.com
Our Facebook group is: https://www.facebook.com/groups/ClassBCamperVans/
wincrasher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2016, 02:53 AM   #29
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 554
Default

Also interesting note about the 2017 Pentastar. I hadn't heard about the "new" EGR valve setup. Thing is, is the new DI version being installed in the PM '17 models??

I understand, to make 2017 emissions, they are going to install the EGR/cooler assembly, other changes are a two stage oil pump, and smaller main journals to lower friction.
mojoman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2016, 01:00 PM   #30
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 12,457
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mojoman View Post
PVC and EGR contribute to the intake side crud. I'm thinking of installing a air/oil separator like this one:
https://www.summitracing.com/parts/m...GQEaAla98P8HAQ
Those are a great idea. We have had throttle body issues on several of our Ford products (Escort/Tracer) and know others that have on Ford V8s. In all the cases it was because oil and/or combustion fumes condensed around the the throttle plate or sensing holes, messing up the airflow or airflow sensing. The PCV lines go into the manifold below the plates, but when you shut off the engine, you can get water vaper/fumes coming up by gravity from the crankcase and condensing on things like the throttle plates. Short trips, cold weather make it much worse.

If you are going to the trouble to do the separator for the PCV, you may also want to track down the other end of the system, where it takes in the air for the PCV. It is usually in the non vacuum intake area above the throttle plates. This line is an even easier path for the vapor and fumes to get on things like the throttle plates, MAF and temp sensors. On the high mile stuff, with a lot of blowby, we would often take the hose off and just put a K&N washable breather on it. Worked good and you could clean it when it fouled. Depending on how you drive, that line can get a lot of airflow through it from the crankcase, as that is where the crankcase pressure goes when you are at throttle positions that reduce vacuum enough to shut off the PCV valve. High blowby can overpower the capacity of the PCV in a lot of engines, besides. All of it goes right through the throttle body in many/most setup.

What you can't get rid of is the occasional bad luck of what place in the cycle any given cylinder is when you shut off. We all have seen the gush of air come back out of a carb when you shut off and a cylinder bleeds back into the intake. Port injection helps this a lot as the entire manifold isn't full of gas.
booster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2016, 01:06 PM   #31
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 12,457
Default

As a sidebar, I have never figured out why they always insist you replace a dirty throttle body. You all kinks of things about protective coatings being damaged by cleaning, etc which would be true if you just shot Gumout into them, but it you just remove them and clean them with a soapy cleaner like 409 and compressed air, they look like new in most cases. Throttle bodies at the dealer have to be one of the most overpriced pieces around.
booster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2016, 07:49 PM   #32
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 554
Default

Just changed the air filter out on my Promaster gas engine and I'm quite impressed with the intake design, very large cylindrical filter, large ducting and cold air intakes through ports in the radiator top frame support. I went with an K&N, which I've installed in every vehicle I've owned in the last 20 years without problem. The price of a K&N filter is close to the price of an OEM one.
mojoman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2016, 11:07 PM   #33
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: PHX, AZ
Posts: 2,660
Default

as we move into discussions of intake crud- my personal experience is that I have never had trouble with an intake on any of my efi vehicles.
I cleaned out the intake on my 2001 gmc 4.8 at about 140,000 miles and it was very very clean- credit synthetic oil and my K&N's i think.
syn is less likely to form vapor deposits...I went to the auction with my neighbor who was an inspector for one of the large wholesale auctions- he was showing my that just pulling the dipstick a couple of inches would indicate whether there is varnish through the motor.

living in AZ we have high heat and very dirty air.

I'm big on K&N's

Mike
mkguitar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2016, 01:46 AM   #34
BBQ
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: East
Posts: 2,483
Default

If they put this engine into the Transit...


BBQ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2016, 02:29 AM   #35
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 554
Default

I'm all in for high tech VVT Direct injection, turbos etc... for vehicles, but I want simplicity and less devices to fail for an RV. The current Transit and Promaster standard V6's are pretty simple for todays engine and reasonably efficient but that will eventually go away with increasing EPA standards. More MPG, lower emissions while increasing the HP/TQ will mean a more efficient engine but more parts and systems that can fail. I shouldn't have this attitude since I've never had a problem with any of the new cars I've bought in the last 25 with the exception of MB and Cadillac. The Honda,Toyota, Kia, Nissan,Acura all have operated flawlessly while I owned them.
mojoman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2016, 08:33 PM   #36
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 299
Default

If you are looking for a Westy replacement have you thought about a Mercedes Metris based camper? I test drove a Metris several weeks ago and it drove very nicely, it's gas, and is a great size. Kind of like a baby Sprinter.

GTRV (link below and 7 in production now), Reimo Americas (prototype in process) and Recon campers (12-18mos away for Metris) are building Westy style pop up campers.

One issue I see with your requirements is the need for a big Air Conditioner... if you wanted that GTRV does put them in the doors or side walls of their vans but I haven't seen that on the Metris yet. Maybe they can help you with a solution. I wish the Danhard (Proair) nonroof AC was available like they use on Sportsmobile popups. I didn't contact Proair or GTRV on this topic because we decided to go with a 144 Sprinter instead (wife wants full toilet room and no pop-up roof).

Photos
Keyne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2016, 04:48 PM   #37
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Kansas City, Ks. Suburb
Posts: 896
Send a message via Yahoo to bobojay
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BBQ View Post
If they put this engine into the Transit...



Did they mention in the video about the sharing the development of that 10 spd with GM? Yes...Ford is starting theirs with the F-150, GM with the Camaro.
New co-developed front wheel drive trans coming also in 2018....
__________________
Bob & Sharon
2019 Winnebago Travato K (2018 Chassis)

Past RV's: 2013 WGO ERA 70A, Chevy PW Lexor
Itasca Navion, 29' Jayco 5th Wheel
bobojay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2016, 05:37 PM   #38
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 554
Default

After spending a lot of effort and $ in insulating, dual pane windows, sun screens, insulated window screens, I find I didn't need the 13500btu air conditioner, although it cools the van down fast, I could have gotten by with the smallest unit, even in the desert.
mojoman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2016, 04:12 PM   #39
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 299
Default

It looks great for a tailgating machine. That rear deck would be awesome to bring to races. Park track side and sit in the screen deck to watch the race. However from a pure camping use the bed and other layout decisions would not be great for us.
Keyne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2016, 12:14 AM   #40
New Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: California
Posts: 3
Default converting a minivan

I also want something small in fact, I want to convert my 2010 Chrysler town and country. The Jucy RV rental is the perfect setup but I can not find where or how they actually convert them. Might be a trade secret but was hoping someone might know and share. SHhh I won't tell.
Thanks for any help.
JemNeye77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT. The time now is 03:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.