"The NEC recommends that the maximum combined voltage drop for both the feeder and branch circuit shouldn't exceed 5%, and the maximum on the feeder or branch circuit shouldn't exceed 3%."
So to power a 120 watt load (typical of a 'twin size' electric blanket) a distance of 50 feet away and follow this 3% recommendation, you would need rather large and expensive 4-AWG wire. 6-AWG was very close at 3.2% drop. 8-AWG had a 5% drop, and 10-AWG had almost 8% drop. 12-AWG had about 12% drop, and 14-AWG had a 17.4% voltage drop, and lost almost 18% of the power in the wiring. So using an 85% efficient 120 VAC inverter (or better) can be more efficient than running DC with 14 AWG wire size.
And this is just a single 120 watt load. Plug in another blanket or move further away and again, you need larger wire.
But at 120 VAC using inverter power, the wire is no longer an issue if you're only drawing 120 watts, even with cords as small 16-AWG. And that's why we use higher voltages for appliances in our homes.
The spreadsheet was done in OpenOffice and available if anyone needs it.
It's unlikely RVs follow this 3% guidance on DC circuits. Does anyone know how RVIA deals with DC circuits?
And this is not exactly a "rule" as much as it is a recommendation.
"Contrary to common belief, the NEC generally doesn't require you to size conductors to accommodate voltage drop. It merely suggests in the Fine Print Notes to 210.19(A), 215.2(A)(4), 230.31(C), and 310.15(A)(1) that you adjust for voltage drop when sizing conductors. It's important for you to remember that Fine Print Notes are recommendations, not requirements [90.5(C)]"
(quoted source:
https://www.ecmweb.com/national-elec...ur-system-down )