I'm now scared to death of the 4so tranny in the 2004 RT 190P.

[Atlee Hokie]

I just finished reading a couple of different long threads on overheating transmissions including all the information supplied by @Booster.

At this point, I'm a little skittish about pursuing any model that has the 4sp. If I were to stay on the east coast I'd be OK, but if I take one more big trip out to Yellowstone and the Tetons I'd be on pins and needles.

[booster]

Originally Posted by Atlee Hokie

I just finished reading a couple of different long threads on overheating transmissions including all the information supplied by @Booster.

At this point, I'm a little skittish about pursuing any model that has the 4sp. If I were to stay on the east coast I'd be OK, but if I take one more big trip out to Yellowstone and the Tetons I'd be on pins and needles.

I think you need to put the whole thing in perspective a bit.


Yes, the 4 speed is prone to over heating under certain conditions, but many folks survive OK without doing anything special.


Climbs like the Eisenhower can be done OK with 4 speed in 3rd gear and the rpms up, for instance. The major issues can come for trying to climb in too high a gear to get the transmission into lockup which is based on rpm.


There are a few times that you get into a spot where you can't get enough power to climb and be in a low enough gear to keep the rpm up, however, and that is what most of the discussions are focused on. For us it was the climb from about 5K feet to 11K feet. You can pull it fine in 3rd gear but the trans won't lock up and you will get hot. If you go to second gear you can get to lockup rpm, but tough to get enough speed to not hold up traffic without a lot of engine noise from rpm and that can make folks uncomfortable.


The previous can be got around in second gear but on one hill up an attraction we had a long, first gear needed to move the van hill. The trans does not lockup, ever, in low gear so there is that issue, plus it was programmed to still shift to second gear if you let off the throttle. When I did that to get around a tight curve, it shifted and just stopped and wouldn't move until totally not moving to get it back in low gear. These are very rare occurrences but do happen to some people. Most can be programmed out of the transmission with a tuner as we have done, but most folks get by fine without doing that.


The 2010 and up 6 speeds lock up nearly all the time except for in low gear when they never lock, but low in them is so low you don't need it to climb as second gear is very low also and locks up. They don't have the heat issues from all the information we have seen over the years.


Is it worth it to hold out for a 6 speed? I can't say as that would be determined by where you go, how often, and your budget.

[Bud]

Originally Posted by booster

I think you need to put the whole thing in perspective a bit.


Yes, the 4 speed is prone to over heating under certain conditions, but many folks survive OK without doing anything special.


Climbs like the Eisenhower can be done OK with 4 speed in 3rd gear and the rpms up, for instance. The major issues can come for trying to climb in too high a gear to get the transmission into lockup which is based on rpm.


There are a few times that you get into a spot where you can't get enough power to climb and be in a low enough gear to keep the rpm up, however, and that is what most of the discussions are focused on. For us it was the climb from about 5K feet to 11K feet. You can pull it fine in 3rd gear but the trans won't lock up and you will get hot. If you go to second gear you can get to lockup rpm, but tough to get enough speed to not hold up traffic without a lot of engine noise from rpm and that can make folks uncomfortable.


The previous can be got around in second gear but on one hill up an attraction we had a long, first gear needed to move the van hill. The trans does not lockup, ever, in low gear so there is that issue, plus it was programmed to still shift to second gear if you let off the throttle. When I did that to get around a tight curve, it shifted and just stopped and wouldn't move until totally not moving to get it back in low gear. These are very rare occurrences but do happen to some people. Most can be programmed out of the transmission with a tuner as we have done, but most folks get by fine without doing that.


The 2010 and up 6 speeds lock up nearly all the time except for in low gear when they never lock, but low in them is so low you don't need it to climb as second gear is very low also and locks up. They don't have the heat issues from all the information we have seen over the years.


Is it worth it to hold out for a 6 speed? I can't say as that would be determined by where you go, how often, and your budget.

I have 125K miles with many in mountains during summer and fall months. My experience with an 05/04 is the same as boosters. If I were to use booster's last sentence, I would buy another one.

There are not that many climbs from 5 to 11K feet in warm/hot weather in my case. So I loose 10 minutes. Or that many steep switch backs at low speeds. I think of it as simply time lost vs a 6 speed.

[Atlee Hokie]

Originally Posted by booster

I think you need to put the whole thing in perspective a bit.


Yes, the 4 speed is prone to over heating under certain conditions, but many folks survive OK without doing anything special.


Climbs like the Eisenhower can be done OK with 4 speed in 3rd gear and the rpms up, for instance. The major issues can come for trying to climb in too high a gear to get the transmission into lockup which is based on rpm.


There are a few times that you get into a spot where you can't get enough power to climb and be in a low enough gear to keep the rpm up, however, and that is what most of the discussions are focused on. For us it was the climb from about 5K feet to 11K feet. You can pull it fine in 3rd gear but the trans won't lock up and you will get hot. If you go to second gear you can get to lockup rpm, but tough to get enough speed to not hold up traffic without a lot of engine noise from rpm and that can make folks uncomfortable.


The previous can be got around in second gear but on one hill up an attraction we had a long, first gear needed to move the van hill. The trans does not lockup, ever, in low gear so there is that issue, plus it was programmed to still shift to second gear if you let off the throttle. When I did that to get around a tight curve, it shifted and just stopped and wouldn't move until totally not moving to get it back in low gear. These are very rare occurrences but do happen to some people. Most can be programmed out of the transmission with a tuner as we have done, but most folks get by fine without doing that.


The 2010 and up 6 speeds lock up nearly all the time except for in low gear when they never lock, but low in them is so low you don't need it to climb as second gear is very low also and locks up. They don't have the heat issues from all the information we have seen over the years.


Is it worth it to hold out for a 6 speed? I can't say as that would be determined by where you go, how often, and your budget.

Thanks for the reply. My budget doesn't allow for a 2010 or newer, so it's either what I looking at or stay with what I have.

The truth be known I would not be going up a road like the one in RMNP. I tried it once but in a station wagon and much younger. Had 2 kids who were 6 and 8. The road I was on had little shoulder, no guard rail, and 500' to 1,000' drops. I was not a happy "camper" to say the least.

[Doneworking]

Booster covers the subject well, as usual.

We have traveled in the mountains most summers since 2007 in our RT 210P and just adjust for a long climb or a really steep climb. I have never really given it much thought, I just adjust my speed and gears and don't worry about things.

How many miles out of every thousand you drive will actually challenge a four speed? Not many for most of us. Is a six speed better? Yes it is for a lot of reasons but a four speed is not a deal killer.

[booster]

Originally Posted by Doneworking

Booster covers the subject well, as usual.

We have traveled in the mountains most summers since 2007 in our RT 210P and just adjust for a long climb or a really steep climb. I have never really given it much thought, I just adjust my speed and gears and don't worry about things.

How many miles out of every thousand you drive will actually challenge a four speed? Not many for most of us. Is a six speed better? Yes it is for a lot of reasons but a four speed is not a deal killer.

Yep, you quite a few others with 4 speeds.


I think if I boil it down to what conditions are the hardest to overcome with a 4 speed they would be two basic types of climbs.


1. Any climb that has to be done in low gear because there is not enough power available at the lower rpm second gear would give. No lockup, not a lot of choice of rpm as the road dictates that. These are very steeep and long hills, and we have run across only one in 16 years we have had our van.


2. A climb that you can use second gear, but the road itself limits you speed so you can't get enough rpm to lockup the converter (probably around 3500 rpm). These are more common, particularly in the Rockies if you are going up to mountain summits. We may have found 7-8 or so of them over the years. Moderately steep, but curvy enough to limit speed a bunch with lots of on/off of the throttle.



In the posts about the 4 speeds and how to reprogram them there are data tables that show the lockup points for the transmission. They are in speed, not rpm, and are based on the typical class b that has 4:10 rear gears.

[peteco]

2006 Roadtrek 210P. So I'm a bit heavier than the Roadtrek 190. 160k miles. Drove from Virginia to California twice. Yellowstone and Tetons no problem. Rockies biggest challenge, but I had no issues. I do turn on the heater if I notice the temperature going up. Get a Scangage to keep track of temps. Make sure you have a transmission cooler. They are easy to install or to get installed if you don't have one. I change fluid and filter every 50k.

My readings indicate the 4-speed is a bit more reliable than the 6-speed, though both have a good track record. I would not hesitate to get another Roadtrek with the 4-speed.

[jojobafanzi]

Originally Posted by Atlee Hokie

I just finished reading a couple of different long threads on overheating transmissions including all the information supplied by @Booster.

At this point, I'm a little skittish about pursuing any model that has the 4sp. If I were to stay on the east coast I'd be OK, but if I take one more big trip out to Yellowstone and the Tetons I'd be on pins and needles.

I wouldn't worry too much about overheating an automatic transmission. Back in the day when I was into rock crawlers and race cars, we realized the transmission cooling lines were insufficient at best and just installed an aftermarket cooling kit on the transmission pan. If an aftermarket pan was not available that had two bungs welded to it for auxiliary cooling system, we just welded on our own. Installed a extra transmission cooler on the front of the radiator, ran hoses to it and installed an auxiliary fuel oil pump to move the fluid. I think the parts cost less than $200.00 back then. Probably the same now. Only use the pump when you need it so it lasts a long time. Great for tow vehicles and snow plow trucks.